The Origins of the Spinning Twins. Carlos del Puente Stories

 The Origins of the Spinning Twins

The birth of the spinning twins was not merely a family event—it was a spectacle so bizarre that even the most imaginative surrealist minds would struggle to conceptualize it. It was a moment that seemed ripped from a dream, filled with inexplicable phenomena that defied conventional understanding. Their arrival into the world was accompanied by an eerie hum, a sound that oscillated between the soothing tones of a distant lullaby and the mechanical whir of turning gears. As the twins emerged, their bodies began to spin uncontrollably, resembling hamster wheels in perpetual motion. This spinning was not a simple quirk but an all-encompassing physical trait that defined their existence from the very first moment.  

In hindsight, the spinning felt like an act of rebellion against the stasis of human life. It was as if the twins had rejected the mundane stillness of humanity and opted instead for a chaotic, kinetic existence. Their mother, bewildered and overwhelmed, described the sight as "the universe laughing at itself." Such a description recalls the surrealist spirit of rejecting rationality and embracing the absurd. As Lusty (2017) notes, surrealism often critiques the natural order of things, dismantling traditional dynamics and replacing them with a playful, chaotic reinvention of reality. The birth of the spinning twins was a living embodiment of this critique—a surrealist manifesto written in flesh and motion.  

Their spinning bodies were not merely a physical anomaly but a gateway to phenomena that defied explanation. Objects in the room began to orbit them as if drawn by an invisible force, creating a miniature solar system around their cribs. The family dog, normally indifferent to human activity, barked incessantly at the twins, its tail spinning like a propeller in response to their presence. These inexplicable phenomena baffled doctors, scientists, and clergy alike. Some speculated that the twins were manifestations of divine humor, while others saw them as evidence of a cosmic error. Moore (2020) suggests that moments of inexplicability often lead us to question not only the physical world but also our spiritual and intellectual frameworks. The twins' birth was precisely such a moment—a surreal disruption demanding new ways of thinking about existence itself.  

The twins' family was no stranger to peculiarities, though the spinning twins took eccentricity to new heights. Their parents, Amelia and Claude Bernard, were amateur philosophers with a penchant for surrealist art, a passion that colored their lives with an aura of absurdity long before the twins arrived. Amelia had spent years attempting to write a treatise on the philosophy of dreams, while Bernard was obsessed with building mazes in their backyard—a hobby that often left the neighbors perplexed. Their shared love of surrealism created a home filled with contradictions, where the logical and illogical coexisted in a delicate balance.  

It was in this peculiar home that the twins began their tumultuous journey. Their spinning bodies quickly became a source of fascination and frustration for their parents, who alternated between seeing them as symbols of cosmic enlightenment and as burdensome anomalies. Fijalkowski and Richardson (2016) argue that surrealist thought often arises in the purlieu of mental and emotional contradictions, where the boundaries between reality and imagination blur. The twins' parents embodied this dynamic, oscillating between hope and despair as they tried to comprehend their children's peculiar nature.  

Family gatherings became surreal performances in their own right. Relatives would come from far and wide to witness the twins' spinning, treating them like living art pieces. The twins' grandmother, a stern matriarch with a penchant for practicality, often tried to stop their spinning by placing heavy blankets on them—a futile act that only seemed to intensify their rotations. Meanwhile, their uncle, a struggling surrealist painter, found inspiration in their movements, creating abstract works that captured the chaotic energy of their spinning bodies. Laxton (2019) notes that surrealists often critique practical functions while embracing life's absurdity, a dynamic clearly reflected in the family's attempts to both control and celebrate the twins' anomaly.  

Despite these moments of absurdity, the family dynamic was deeply dysfunctional. The twins' spinning bodies became a metaphor for the family's inability to find stability. Their parents often argued over how best to raise them, with Amelia advocating for a philosophical approach and Bernard insisting on scientific experimentation. The twins, unable to comprehend the discord, communicated their distress through a private language—a cryptic tongue that further isolated them from the world. As Smith (2023) observes, the mental operations of perception are often fraught with familial tensions, a reality that shaped the twins' early years and deepened their psychological detachment.  

The spinning twins' bodies were both a marvel and a curse—a physical anomaly that shaped every aspect of their lives. On a literal level, their spinning made ordinary tasks (eating, walking, sleeping) impossibly difficult. Their movements were unpredictable, often sending them crashing into walls or furniture. Bernard once attempted to design a specialized harness (braces inspired by Daniel Gottlob Moritz Schreber) to stabilize them, but the experiment failed spectacularly, resulting in a centrifugal explosion that shattered the dining table. These physical challenges created a sense of isolation for the twins, who struggled to interact with the world conventionally. Elder (2015) notes that surrealist movements often explore themes of exile and loss, dynamics central to the twins' experience of their spinning bodies.  

On a metaphorical level, their spinning became a symbol of psychological detachment and existential chaos. The twins often described their spinning as a "whirlpool of thoughts," a constant motion reflecting the turbulence of their inner worlds. Polizzotti (2024) argues that surrealist works must explore mental spaces beyond conventional frameworks—a principle clearly reflected in the twins' spinning. Their bodies became living metaphors for the absurdity of human existence, challenging those around them to reconsider the boundaries between the physical and the psychological.  

The spinning also influenced their perception of time and space. They often claimed to experience moments of temporal distortion, where seconds stretched into hours and memories blurred into dreams. This phenomenon led Bernard to speculate that their spinning bodies were creating miniature time loops, a theory he attempted to prove with increasingly elaborate experiments. Chadwick (2017) suggests that surrealist works often explore themes of fear, exile, and collapse—dynamics evident in the twins' distorted perception of reality. Their spinning bodies became not just a physical anomaly but a gateway to surreal reflections on time, space, and existence.  

The origins of the spinning twins are a testament to surrealism's power to disrupt conventional narratives and create new ways of understanding existence. From their surreal birth to their peculiar family dynamics, their story is one of absurdity and existential chaos—a living embodiment of surrealist thought. Their spinning bodies, both a physical anomaly and a metaphor for psychological detachment, challenge us to reconsider the boundaries between the real and the surreal, the physical and the philosophical. As Sen (2019) notes, the art of the absurd allows us to access new dimensions of thought—a principle clearly reflected in the twins' extraordinary lives.  

In the end, the spinning twins remind us that absurdity is not merely a disruption but a gateway to deeper reflections on the nature of existence. Their spinning bodies, like the surrealist works that inspired their parents, force us to confront life's chaos and contradictions, challenging us to find meaning in the madness. Their story is not just one of family and anomaly but a philosophical journey into the heart of surrealism—a reminder that the boundaries between reality and imagination are not as fixed as we might think.