The absence, as a narrative tool, occupies a unique space in the narrative. Challenge conventional expectations and immerse readers in stages with logic and reason. In Fyodor's roulette, the absurd is not simply a backdrop; It is the very essence of the narrative, mixing humor and horror to create a disconcerting experience but at the same time attractive. The absence amplifies the inherent unpredictability of life, highlighting chaos and conflict that define human relations. Through surrealist situations, strange dynamics of character, and an interaction of humor and fear, the roulette of Fyodor explores the deep complexities of the absurd, inviting readers to laugh even while shuddering.

The absence thrives in the incongruity, a semantic violation that juxtaposes opposition elements to create surprise and discomfort. As Straßburger (2022) points out, the incongruity is the linguistic maternal that triggers both humor and horror. In Fyodor's roulette, this incongruity is manifested in the wheel of the roulette itself, an seemingly harmless object transformed into a portal to chaos. The wheel turns dictate events with a disturbing randomness, pushing characters to surrealist situations that challenge the explanation to the most sensible. Absurdity becomes the glue that unites humor and horror, ensuring that the narrative remains attractive but unpredictable.

For example, consider the association between Sherlock Holmes and The Joker. Holmes, the epitome of logic and deduction, is working with Joker, a chaotic chaos. His investigation into the mysterious crime linked to the roulette wheel develops in a way that is hilarious and terrifying. While Holmes tries to apply reason to the absurd clues, the Joker undermines him on each lap, delivering cryptic enigmas and mocking laughter. Duo interactions create a disorienting experience for readers, mixing the comic banthering with the chilling unpredictability of the intentions of the Joker. This interaction reflects Straßburger's statement that humor and horror originate from the same root - incongruption - and can coexist perfectly in a narrative (Straßburger, 2022).

Absurdity also serves as a mirror of the human condition, exposing the fragility of our understanding of reality. Of Souza Olivo (2022) explores how Gothic literature uses supernatural elements to evoke horror, creating a sense of restlessness that reflects human fears and uncertainties. Similarly, Fyodor's roulette uses the absurd to amplify chaos and conflict themes, presenting characters that are pleased with the arbitrary influence of the roulette in their lives. The absurd highlights the unpredictability of human existence, forcing the characters - and the readers - to face the futility to seek order in a chaotic world.

Absurd situations in Fyodor's roulette are meticulously elaborated to generate humor maintaining an underlying sense of fear. For example, the reimaginated association between Holmes and The Joker exemplifies this dynamic. The logical approach of Holmes to research contrasts markedly with the erratic behavior of The Joker, creating moments of comic tension. However, under humor there is a disturbing truth: the unpredictability of the Joker threatens to derail the investigation completely, leaving Holmes - and the reader - to the edge. Schwind (2024) explores the interaction of the comic structure and horror tropes, emphasizing how absurd can amplify both. In Fyodor's roulette, absurd situations achieve this balance by juxtaining the family with the stranger. For example, Anna Karenina, a tragic literary figure, is reimagined as an infessed player obsessed with the roulette wheel. His exaggerated personality and ingenious comments provide comic relief, but his obsession hints a deeper despair, creating a disturbing dichotomy. This mixture of humor and fear reflects Schwind's statement that the absurd improves the emotional impact of the narrative by juxtaposed opposition elements (Schwind, 2024).

Another example of absurdity in Fyodor's roulette is the role of Georg Halay as the "custody" of the roulette wheel. 

The iconic 20025: A space odyssey is reimagined with an absurd turn, offering cryptic advice to the characters while occasionally works humorously. Monotone of music adds a layer of irony, since its robotic logic collides with the chaos of the roulette. However, the presence of Georg Halay also evokes a feeling of fear, since his cryptic warnings hint darkest consequences for those who play with the wheel. This duality of humor and horror is essential for narrative, underlining the unpredictability of life and the absurdity of human efforts.

Austerity is not simply a tool for entertainment; It serves a deeper purpose amplifying the central themes of chaos and the conflict in the Fyodor roulette. Novaković (2022) examines how humor and visual absurd can mitigate tragedy by exposing underlying conflicts. In Fyodor's roulette, the absurdity of the influence of the roulette creates a constant state of tension between the characters, reflecting the chaotic nature of human relationships. The wheel turns exacerbate existing conflicts, causing betrayals, misunderstandings and emotional agitation.

For example, Fyodor Dostoevsky's bet on the roulette wheel causes a chaos chain reaction between the assembly. Its existence Georg Halay's struggles are reflected in the absurdity of the wheel results, which challenge logic and reason. Dostoevsky interactions with Georg Halay highlight the conflict between human ambition and the randomness of destiny. His philosophical debates, infused with irony and humor, reveal the fragility of human efforts to the absurd. Novaković's statement that humor and absurd can expose conflicts is evident in these interactions, since they underline the unpredictable nature of life and the consequences of chance (Novaković, 2022).

The absurd also amplifies the emotional depth of the narrative creating moments of vulnerability in the midst of chaos. Germanà (2024) explores how horror and laughter coexist in narratives to evoke complex emotions. In Fyodor's roulette, the characters experience moments of despair and introspection, juxtaposed with absurd humor. For example, Anna Karenina's obsession with the roulette leads to a humorous interaction with The Joker, who mocks her game strategies. However, its underlying despair is evident, creating a moving contrast that deepens the emotional resonance of the narrative. Germanà's analysis highlights how absurd can evoke a range of emotions, reflecting the complexities of human relationships (Germanà, 2024). XX

The absurd in Fyodor's roulette is not limited to isolated situations; It permeates the entire narrative, creating a cohesive experience that mixes humor and horror. Ananda and Wibowo (2025) examine how humor in Indonesian Comedy-Chorror films exposes social issues, revealing the interaction between collective fears and individual desires. Similarly, Fyodor's roulette uses the absurd to explore universal issues of human opportunity, ambition and relations. The roulette wheel becomes a metaphor for the unpredictability of life, symbolizing the randomness that governs human existence.

The transferability of humor and horror theories is evident in the narrative ability to evoke a wide range of emotions. Kehoe (2025) explores how humor theories facilitate a better understanding of dynamic interaction between humor and horror. In Fyodor's roulette, Clenge Readers absurd situations to find meaning in chaos, creating an experience that causes thoughts. For example, the climate turn of the roulette wheel leaves the resolution open, inviting readers to reflect whether the wheel represents freedom or trap. This ambiguity reflects Kehoe's statement that humor and horror can coexist to create narratives that cause deeper reflections on the human condition (Kehoe, 2025).

In Fyodor's roulette, the absurd is not simply a narrative device; It is an objective through which the complexities of human relations and stocks are examined. The mixture of humor and horror creates a disorienting but attractive experience. Through surreal situations, strange dynamics and an interaction of humor and fear, the roulette of Fyodor amplifies chaos and conflict issues, revealing the fragility of human efforts to the absurdity.

The absurd in the narrative reflects the theories explored by Straßburger (2022), by Souza Olivo (2022), Schwind (2024), Novaković (2022), Germanà (2024), Ananda and Wibowo (2025), and Kehoe (2025). His ideas about the interaction of humor and horror underline the deep impact of the absurd in the narrative, highlighting his ability to evoke complex emotions and cause deepest reflections on the human condition. Fyodor's roulette invites readers to laugh and shudder, offering an exploration of the absurd caused by thought as a window to chaos and conflict that define human existence.

The crime: threads of deception and despair

Family conflict: by the spin bonuses

In the agitated chaos of Fyodor's roulette, central family dynamics develops as an intricate dance of shadows and light, revealing the complex relationships that unite and tear the characters within this surrealist narrative. In the heart of all this is a reimagined father-son relationship between Fyodor Dostoevsky and a fictionalized literary creation of his own, a character that embodies the tumultuous essence of the internal and existing struggles of Dostoevsky. We are going to deepen this dynamic, exploring how the roulette wheel serves not only as a portal to the absurd, but also as a catalyst for conflict, misunderstandings and emotional tumult that threaten to unravel the very fabric of their family ties.

By turning the roulette wheel, the world around is transformed into a cacophony of colors and sounds, reflecting the chaotic nature of existence itself. Dostoevsky, with his intense look and furrow eyebrow, becomes both the father and the philosopher, dealing with the weight of his own narrative and the implications of his creations. His son Alexei - a name soaked in the moral squares often faced by the protagonists of Dostoevsky - arises from the depths of his father's imagination, a character full of duality of hope and despair. The father-son relationship is impregnated with layers of complexity, since Alexei seeks validation and understanding of his father, who, in turn, struggles to reconcile his own demons with the paternal love he longs for expressing.

In this surreal landscape, the roulette wheel becomes a symbol of chance and destination, echoing the uncertainties that define their lives. By turning the wheel, it reflects the unpredictable nature of human relations, where a moment of choice can lead to a waterfall of consequences. Dostoevsky already often revolves around the themes of free will against determinism, and now, through Alexei, he faces the reality of his own creation, questioning if he has the power to shape the destiny of his son or if it is simply a pawn in the great game orchestrated by the roulette.

The tension intensifies while the characters navigate the absurd realities of their existence. Each wheel turn amplifies its emotional agitation, giving rise to misunderstandings that fracture its link. One night, while sitting in a room full of humidity of the roulette, Alexei, frustrated by his father's obsession with chance, confronts Dostoevsky. Why do you play with our lives, father? Implore, his voice dyed of despair. Don't you see how this madness separates us? "

Dostoevsky, caught in the stirrups of its existence in crisis, responds with a heavy heart, “but Alexei, life itself is a bet, a series of options taken in the dark of uncertainty. I have created you, but I cannot control the fate that is beyond the turn of this wheel.” His words hang in the air, echoing with the weight of his shared reality. At this time, the admission of the father's impotence deepens the crack between them, while Alexei clings to the idea that his existence is a mere reflection of his father's struggles.

As the roulette wheel continues to turn, it becomes an omnipresent force in their lives, representing not only the opportunity but also the consequences of its elections. The absurdity of his situation becomes increasingly evident since they are trapped in a network of betrayals and misunderstandings. For example, Alexei, looking for approval, makes an imprudent decision to participate in a set of high shots that implies the roulette's wheel, believing that he will demonstrate his value for his father. However, this bet leads to unforeseen consequences that threaten its fragile link.

In a steep scene, Alexei returns home, his pale face and tremor. Father, I have lost everything, he admits, his voice just above a whisper. I thought I could win your admiration, but all I have done is bring shame about us. Dostoevsky, overwhelmed with a mixture of anger and sadness, responds hard, "you thought you could escape the chaos of our existence first by diving in it? You have only aggravated our suffering, Alexei."

This exchange highlights the fragile nature of its relationship, where the moments of vulnerability are quickly overwhelmed by accusations and emotional distance. The wheel, now a cruel reminder of their struggles, seems to make fun of its connection attempts. While navigating this absurd landscape, emotional agitation deepens, revealing cracks in their family bond. The roulette wheel, a symbol of the opportunity and despair, serves as a constant reminder of the bets involved in their relationship.

When exploring the metaphorical meaning of the roulette's wheel, we discovered its role as a representation of randomness and futility of human existence. Each turn reflects the unpredictable nature of life, where options can lead to joy or suffering or both at the same time, often without any clear rationality. The dialogue between Dostoevsky and Alexei becomes increasingly oblivious to existence, he emphasizes, since he staples with the implications of his actions. "Isn't it absurd," Murmur Dostoevsky murmurs, "that we are mere players in a game where the rules are unknown, and the results are often tragic?"

Alexei, fighting with his own understanding of his reality, contradicts, "perhaps in this absurd we find meaning, father. If we want to live in chaos, we hug and find our own purpose within it. This exchange encapsulates the conflict ideologies that define their relationship: Dostoevsky, the tormented philosopher, and Alexei, the hopeful idealist.

Emotional agitation reaches a climax for a crucial moment when the wheel rotates one last time, throwing a rotating shadow over their lives. While the ball dances around the wheel, both characters are forced to face the consequences of their choices. The tension is palpable, thick air with unpainted words and unresolved feelings. "This is not just a game," says Alexei, his stable voice despite confusion inside. "It is our naked life, a testament to the ties that we have forged and the chaos that we must navigate."

In this moment of clarity, the absurdity of its existence becomes naked, illuminating the fragility of its ties. The roulette, once a symbol of opportunity, becomes a mirror that reflects their struggles, their hopes and fears. It serves as a reminder that even before chaos, they must strive to understand each other, to repair the cracks that threaten to tear them.

As history develops, family dynamics between Dostoevsky and Alexei becomes a moving exploration of the human condition, illustrating the complexities of love, betrayal and search for meaning in an unpredictable world. Its relationship, brought to tension and misunderstandings, serves as a microcosm of the greatest issues of the narrative - absence, conflict and the consequences of the choice.

In the end, the roulette turns, leaving behind a tapestry of emotions and experiences that shape their trip. Dostoevsky and Alexei, although beaten by chaos, begin to find comfort in their shared struggles, understanding that family ties, although fragile, can support the tumult of existence. Perhaps, Dostoevsky reflects, is to embrace how absurd we can really connect, finding strength in our vulnerabilities. ”

His journey through the chaos labyrinth is marked by moments of laughter, pain and deep insight, while learning to navigate the complexities of their relationship. The wheel of the roulette, symbol of despair and hope, serves as a reminder that even in the face of uncertainty, the ties that unite can be a source of force.

Ultimately, the family conflict within the Roulette of  Fyodor encapsulates the essence of human experience, an exploration of the fragile nature of the family bonds between chaos and the absurd. While Dostoevsky and Alexei face their demons, they come to understand that, like the roulette wheel, life is a series of unpredictable turns, each forming their journey in ways that they could never have imagined. It is in this acceptance of chaos that find the possibility of connection, forging a new understanding of their relationship between the disconcerting currents of existence.

The investigation: a police procedure in Pandemonium

In the chaotic landscape of Fyodor's roulette, investigation is developed as a surreal police procedure. This narrative, led by any more than the brilliant but eccentric Sherlock Holmes and the unpredictable Harbinger of Chaos, The Joker, is a magician of logic and absurdity. While the two iconic figures collide, they represent two different approaches from the chaos that surrounds the roulette wheel, which is located in the center of this strange world. Holmes, with his unwavering rationality and his acute powers of deduction, opposes The Joker, whose chaotic whims and crooked humor serve as an enemy and a catalyst for research.

The initial adjustment is an illuminated room with the weak sound of the roulette turning at the bottom, its rhythm resonating like a beat. The walls are adorned with surreal art to cabaret, representing distorted faces and landscapes that seem to change and change with the Flicker of the light of the sail -style candle the years 1930. It is here where Holmes is, his sharp look like the metal wheels of the trains scanning the slope room, while the joker night rooms in a corner, pulling a cover of the men of sound laughter in the absurdity of everything. The juxtaposition of its personalities establishes the scenario for an investigation that oscillates between moments of dark humor and sinister horror.

The investigation begins with a cryptic message fluttered in a piece of paper, an enigma that seems to mock the deductive reasoning of Holmes. "To find the truth, you must first hug the madness," he says. This message, imbued with the Joker's signing touch, leads Holmes to contemplate the very nature of the investigation itself. How can one look for order when chaos reigns as a supreme master? The enigma becomes a reason for his trip Holmes to get out of his comfort zone and embrace the absurd that surrounds him.

While Holmes thoroughly examines the scene, discover a series of strange clues that challenge conventional logic. A rubber chicken is close to the roulette, juxtaposed with a broken pocket watch. The vision of such incongruity drives Holmes to commit to an internal monologue, discussing the importance of these elements. "What relevance does a yellow rubber chicken have in a murder investigation?" Murmurs, while the  Joker breaks into laughter, revealing himself in the non -sensory nature of the clues. "Everything makes sense, my dear Holmes, if you are willing to look for him in the right way!" He responds, his eyes shining with some evil.

With each track they discover, the research cools more in chaos. An apparently unrelated event, a spontaneous dance between characters from several literary and cinematographic kingdoms, leads to a revelation on the dark past of the roulette. The initial irritation of Holmes in the absurdity of the dance-off is transformed into a moment of clarity since it realizes that the actions of these characters are intertwined with the central mystery of the cabaret stage. The Joker, always the instigator, encourages a more playful approach, insisting that chaos can often lead to unexpected ideas.

The tension in his investigation grows while navigating the thin line between humor and horror. The dance-off, full of exaggerated movements and ridiculous costumes, is quickly transformed into a nightmare show while the characters begin to lose control of their bodies, forced to dance to the whims of the roulette in the way the flaccid skinny bodies and elongated of a strange type of died wild rats under the continued pressure of robust sides of robust strokes. Laughter echoes through the air, but is loaded with insistent fear. The faces of the characters are twisted in grotesque expressions while succumbing to chaos, embodying the very essence of the absurd that permeates this world.

Holmes remains firm in his search for truth, even while the Joker  thrives in the pandemonium. They stumble upon a series of strange shows, where the characters recite non -sensory poetry that hids deeper truths hidden under the surface. For example, Anna Karenina recites lines about the futility of love in the midst of a curtain of rotating wheels and distorted mirrors under the shadows of gigantic spiders. Each action serves as a reflection of the chaotic reality that inhabit, further complicating research.

The interaction between humor and horror is palpable at the moment. Holmes, always the detective, tries to decipher the meaning behind Anna's words, but the Joker interrupts with an exam that sends them spiral in the form of laughter. This oscillation creates a tension that increases the absurdity of your situation. You will see, Holmes, the Joker is rolled up, life is just a roulette game! Or you take a risk or stay behind the absurd dust as happened to unknown William James Sidis (SIGH-DIS)! ” His words are true, but they also serve to underline the terrible reality of their situation. As the investigation progresses, the issues of the order against chaos and the human search for meaning in an irrational world are increasing. Holmes, with his analytical mind, strives to impose logical to the chaotic landscape, but is continually frustrated by the surreal nature of his surroundings. The Joker, on the other hand, embraces chaos, revealing himself in the absurd and finding humor in the darkest of situations. Their contrasting approaches highlight the most broad existence the question that permeates the narrative.

In a moment, when passing through the remains of a chaotic carnival, Holmes finds a maze mirror that reflects its own image of distorted forms. It clings to the idea that perhaps order is an illusion, a facade that masks the inherent chaos of existence. The Joker, observing the struggle of Holmes, laughs deeply. You are starting to get it, detective! Life is just a series of reflections - nothing is as it seems! " His words resonate with Holmes, causing a moment of introspection.

The investigation also takes them to a stranger, chaired by Georg Halay, where the characters are accused of crimes that seem trivial in the great scheme of things. The absurd process also illustrates the struggle for meaning in a world that often feels devoid of it. Holmes, trying to maintain a sense of order, is caught on the absurd website while the Joker reveals in the train chaos. "We are all guilty of something, right?" The Spider Joker, throwing popcorn in the air, encapsulating the essence of the absurd that surrounds them.

The investigation reaches a climax when Holmes and The Joker finally confront the roulette itself, the source of chaos and the center of their investigation. The wheel rotates wildly, its colors mixed in a madidoscope of madness. As they approach, they face the incarnation of their fears and desires, taking the form of several characters from literature and the film. Each character represents a different facet of the chaos that has been developed, forcing Holmes to face the very nature of their order search.

In this moment of confrontation, the absurd issues. Holmes realizes that the search for meaning is useless in a world governed by chance, but is not willing to give up despair. Perhaps it is the trip itself that has value, mutters, reflecting on the absurdity of your adventure. The Joker, with a manic smile, adds: And what glorious journey has been! Life is a carnival, dear Holmes, and we are only players in this great show! "

As the wheel turns towards an end, the characters are in front of an choice: embrace chaos or succumb to despair that hides under the surface. Research culminates in a moment of surreal clarity, where the absurdity of its situation becomes a source of liberation instead of confinement. They realize that, when embracing chaos, they can forge their own meaning in the midst of confusion.

After the investigation, Holmes and the Joker emerge transformed. The detective once rigid now carries an indication of madness in his eyes, his mind altered by experience. The Joker, faithful to the form, continues to reveal himself in chaos, his laugh echoing through the halls of his shared reality. Its association, born of conflicts and absurdities, has become a deep understanding of the complexity of existence.

While they are facing the roulette wheel, Holmes reflects the nature of his research. Perhaps, he concludes, the true essence of life is not in search of order, but in the acceptance of chaos. The Joker nodded, his smile widening. And in laughter we share among madness!

In this surreal police procedure, investigation serves as microcosm of human experience: an exploration of the tension between order and chaos, logic and absurdity, humor and horror. Through the lens of Holmes and The Joker, the narrative invites readers to face the unpredictable nature of life and the search for meaning in an irrational world. As the wheel rotates once again, it lets us question our own options and the delicate balance between freedom and trap. In the end, it is the hug of the absurd that allows us to navigate the chaos of existence, transforming our search for meaning into a vibrant dance with destiny. 

By Carlos del Puente relatos